Leadership, Management & Life in the Workplace
  • Blog
  • About John
  • Decoding the Workplace
  • Dr. Juran AIG Archival Project
  • Contact
  • Disclaimers

Characteristics of Narcissistic Leaders

4/27/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
What are the characteristics and behaviors of narcissistic leaders? In Decoding the Workplace I differentiated healthy narcissistic leaders from unhealthy ones. “Healthy narcissistic leaders understand their strengths and know when to seek the advice of others” (pp. 105-106). In a 2014 blog I shared findings from a literature review of narcissists.
 
In a 2018 The Leadership Quarterly article, Charles O’Reilly III (Stanford), Bernadette Doerr (UC,Berkeley), and Jennifer Chatman (UC,Berkeley) concluded “although some researchers have suggested that narcissistic CEOs may have a positive influence on organizational performance . . . a growing body of evidence suggests that organizations led by narcissistic CEOs experience considerable downsides.” Their research focused on “grandiose narcissism” in which the narcissist is highly assertive, extroverted, with high self-esteem. Characteristics include:
  •  Inflated sense of entitlement
  •  Unrealistic sense of personal superiority
  •  Viewing others as inferior
  •  Overconfidence
  • “Willingness to manipulate others”
  • “Hostility and aggression when challenged”
In reviewing studies of narcissistic leaders, they found narcissistic leaders:
  • “More likely to emerge as leaders”
  • “Charming,” good first impressions
  •  More persistent at focusing on task at hand
  • “More willing to take chances”
  • “Overly confident about own judgment”
  • “Discount negative feedback”
  • “See others as less competent”
  •  Pursue activities and strategies that are self-enhancing.
  • “Believe themselves less vulnerable to being penalized for their overconfidence”
  • “Lower in integrity”
  • “More likely to engage in unethical behavior”
  •  More likely “to engage in sexual harassment”
  •  More likely to bully others
  •  Inhibit the exchange of information among group members
Studies indicate narcissistic CEOs more likely to:
  • “Manipulate corporate earnings”
  • “Aggressively avoid paying taxes”
  •  Produce financial reports “with lower accounting quality”
  • “Misreport financial status”
  •  To “be at risk of committing fraud”
O’Reilly and his colleagues reported two experimental studies and a field study of 32 technology companies. Their field study found companies with more narcissistic CEOs had “more lawsuits filed against them and the lawsuits” endured “for longer periods of time.” Companies “with more narcissistic CEOs are more likely to be sued and this litigation will take longer to be resolved.”
 
My take-aways:
 
1.  Hiring: It may be difficult to identify unhealthy narcissists when hiring. References may or may not be forthcoming with accurate assessments. In interviewing notice how much credit the potential hire gives to others when discussing accomplishments. 
 
2. Promoting: Interestingly highly narcissistic leaders get promoted. They charm, take credit for accomplishments, and so forth. Where input can be obtained from subordinates, such as in a 360-degree assessment, the organization should obtain more information and perhaps a more accurate picture. 
 
3. Managing: Those who supervise a highly narcissistic individual who is damaging the morale or financial health of the organization should do their jobs. Be accountable and hold that individual accountable. Corporate boards should do likewise. 
 
O'Reilly III, C. A., Doerr, B., & Chatman, J. A. (2018). "See you in court": How CEO narcissism increases firms' vulnerability to lawsuits. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 365-378.
 
Image by beligte from https://pixabay.com/photos/chess-pawn-shadow-dark-king-ego-7332067/
​
Modified from my blog, 10/30/2018. © John Ballard, PhD, 2025. All rights reserved.
 _________________________
Decoding the Workplace. “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education. The best-selling audiobook and CD are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

Characteristics of Less Effective Managers

3/31/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Google how to be an effective manager and the results will mostly be about leading people. Effective management is about achieving goals, getting things done. It is easy to say ineffective management is the opposite, that is, failing to achieve goals. But there are other behaviors that characterize ineffective managers.

Wickham Skinner and W. Earl Sasser discussed these behaviors in a Harvard Business Review article over 40 years ago. Their observations about behavioral characteristics of less effective managers still ring true:
  1. accepting conventional company wisdom without question; example, “we always promote from within”  
  2. acting too slowly when changes are needed now
  3. tolerating subordinates who are ineffective, hinting at improvements needed instead of taking decisive action
  4. not challenging the way things are done, “we have always done it this way”
  5. not handling priorities
  6. not taking calculated risks, lack of “boldness, nerve, and self-confidence”
  7. not asking for help or advice when needed
  8. not recognizing their own weaknesses 

My take-ways: 

1. Have you seen managers who exhibit these characteristics? I have many times, even managers who had good people skills and were liked by those with whom they worked. Sometimes they were just too busy putting out fires. Sometimes it just seemed that it would be too much trouble and take too much energy to challenge the status quo. Different reasons for different managers.

2. Often the complacency or lack of initiative is a function of organizational culture. What happens if you take risks and fail? The consequences become part of the culture. Challenge conventional wisdom and get shot down? The consequences become part of the culture. Ask for help or advice and then have this seen as a sign of weakness. Again, part of the culture. Culture is difficult to change but if the culture is not what you want it to be, then as leaders we should act to change it. 

3. I wrote in an earlier blog that these characteristics could be used to develop a good questionnaire or scale to measure managerial effectiveness. Years later I realize these might also make good items to help assess culture. To be innovative, to compete, organizations need people who challenge the status quo, make change where change is needed, hold others accountable, and have enough self-confidence to ask for help when needed. To lead is to do more than just the job. 

Skinner, W. & Sasser, W.E. (1977). Managers with impact: Verstile and inconsistent. Harvard Business Review, 55(6), 140-8.

Image by geralt. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/illustrations/company-people-silhouettes-975969/

This blog modified from my previous blog 1/19/19. © John Ballard, PhD,  2025. All rights reserved. 
_______________________
Decoding the Workplace. “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education. The best-selling audiobook and CD are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

The Two Es

2/27/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
I read the news today, oh boy. Everywhere writers, newscasters, pundits, and especially one multi-billionaire are talking about efficiency. As a consultant and management professor I find this very interesting. In Business 101 we teach the two “e’s”. I am only reading and seeing discussion of one “e”. Where are the discussions about effectiveness? 
 
Efficiency is about making the best use of your resources. Getting more from your existing resources or perhaps getting the same results with less resources. Reusing rocket boosters is a great way for a space company to improve efficiency. Unfortunately for many organization improving efficiency often takes the form of saving money by eliminating positions, firing people. In the best organizations people are viewed as assets, not costs. Firing people is usually not the best strategy to reduce costs. However it is often the first. 
 
A job does not just exist in some position description. A job is a position a person inhabits and makes their own. For most over time, people find ways to simplify tasks to be performed. They learn to whom to talk to get information, to get things done. This is called tacit knowledge, knowledge that is only developed on the job. In eliminating a person from a position, you have a good chance of losing that tacit knowledge that made that person more effective -- for example, better at providing good customer service. 
 
Effectiveness is about achieving results intended, accomplishing the goals that have been set. You can be very effective but not efficient. You can be very efficient but not effective. The key to great organizational performance is to be both efficient and effective. In the efficiency initiatives now playing out in the media, I would like to see discussions of effectiveness. 
 
The key to improving both efficiency and effectiveness is something often lost in organizations – accountability. Elliott Jaques (pronounced Jacks) argued that bureaucracy is actually a good form of organization. The problem is that it is rarely implemented correctly. Why? The failure to hold managers at each level accountable. Managers are responsible for the outcomes their people produce but also for developing their people. 
 
How will the efficiency measures we read and hear about each day now affect the effectiveness of the organizations impacted?

"Rocket Launch, Night" by SpaceX-Imagery. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/photos/rocket-launch-night-countdown-693214/​
​
© John Ballard, PhD, 2025. All rights reserved.
 _________________________
Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education. Available as ebook, hardback, paperback, audiobook, and audio CD. The best-selling audiobook and CD are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

What Are You Reading?

1/26/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
My annual blog about the importance of reading books, modified from my previous January blogs. 
 
Have you ever asked, “What are you reading?” or “Are you reading anything interesting?” The answers may give  ideas on what you might like to read or insights into a friend, colleague, or new acquaintance. My experience is the best leaders always have a book they are reading. Reading is essential to lifelong learning.

What role do books play in your life? In your learning? My guess is that for many, we just don’t have enough time. For me this past year making time to read was difficult. But making time to read books is important. I usually have several books in my study that I am working through. On long trips I enjoy audiobooks. I have friends who like audiobooks best. The audio version of my book Decoding the Workplace is the most popular format.
 
A couple years ago I read the book Surrender by Bono, a memoir. Several people recommended I listen to the audiobook so I did. The audiobook includes music and sound effects and other audio features. I loved it. Perhaps too much. I listened to it three times while driving in my car. If you have any interest in Bono, U2, or making things happen at the highest levels of societies, it’s a must. 

Another book I kept returned to in 2024 was Science of Life After Death, a Springer Brief in Psychology by Alexander Moreira-Almeida and colleagues. This short volume (80 pages) summarizes the best available evidence for our survival beyond death. And yes, there is scientific evidence. 

My favorite film director is Stanley Kubrick. It should be no surprise that one of my most engrossing reads this year was Kubrick: An Odyssey by Robert Kolter and Nathan Adams. I am still working on this one. Great insights, new understandings of what Kubrick was trying to do, his creative innovations and contributions to the art of movie-making. I read about each film. Then watch the film with a greater understanding. 
 
Last I should mention a delightful children’s book recommended by a friend, The Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet by Eleanor Cameron (1954). Thoroughly enjoyed though I rarely like mushrooms. 

As we begin 2025, here are a few of the books that are on my reading list:
  • The Great Work of Your Life by Stephen Cope
  • In Ascension by Martin MacInnes
  • I.Asimov by Isaac Asimov
  • A Chaotic Life: The Memoirs of Stanley Krippner, Pioneering Humanistic Psychologist (3 Volumes) by Stanley Krippner
  • Time Expansion Experiences by Steve Taylor
  • Winning Essays 2023: Proof of Survival of Human Consciousness Beyond Permanent Bodily Death (5 Volumes) by The Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies
How do you nurture book reading in those who do not enjoy reading? As leaders, we lead by example. We talk about books we are reading, we share stories, we talk about how books have affected our lives. I'm often asked what book influenced me the most as a manager and consultant. Easy to answer: Peter Drucker's Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. I came across this book as a young manager when I was first building consulting capabilities in my teams. I have returned to it for knowledge, wisdom, and ideas throughout my careers.  

“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them," Mark Twain. 

Or as the comedian Groucho Marx said, “Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.”   
 
What are you reading?
___________________________________
 Image, my photo. 
​
© John Ballard, PhD, 2025. All rights reserved.
 _________________________

Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018.  The best-selling audiobook, and CD, are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

Improving Santa's Operation

12/22/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Santa Claus operation has areas where significant improvements are possible. Thomas Stetz of Hawaii Pacific University addressed some of these in his classic article, “What Santa Claus Can Learn from I-O Psychology: Eight Performance Management Recommendations.” The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist originally published the article in 2012 and it can be read in full in the archives of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Here I summarize (and elaborate on) Dr. Stetz’s astute observations and recommendations concerning Santa Claus’s questionable performance management system.
​
  1. “Develop refined rating scales.” How does Santa determine whether a child is “naughty” or “nice”? What is naughty? What is nice? How can a child improve performance if the child does not have clear guidelines and examples of the behaviors expected?
  2. “Develop SMART performance objectives.” A child needs clear goals to be successful at “nice,” goals that are “specific, measureable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound.” Ideally these would flow from the family strategic plan.
  3. “Increase feedback throughout the year.” It’s either a lump of coal or presents one day a year. 364 days with no feedback is just not acceptable in the 21st Century. If feedback is too much for Santa to handle, he should delegate and train others, such as parents. 
  4. “Establish a naughty review board.” There may be review boards in organizations that are naughty; this recommendation concerns grievances. What’s a child to do if deemed naughty and considers this an unfair assessment? Is it fair to not have a grievance procedure, especially in the absence of feedback?
  5. “Get a handle on rating inflation.” Let’s be real. It seems most children get a “nice” rating and the associated benefits. Refined rating scales would definitely help here.
  6. “Explain how he obtains his information.” This one puzzled me as a kid. How does he know if I am being naughty or nice? As Stetz’s very appropriately noted, “at least a consent-to-monitoring statement should be made.”
  7. “Decide between developmental or administrative evaluations.” “Under the current system how can naughty children improve. They can’t” (p. 36). There is no feedback. Children simply did not know how to improve their performance. Santa’s performance system is administrative with only “rewards and punishments.”
  8. “Institute self-assessments.” Instead of writing letters to Santa once a year, which not all children do, there should be periodic self-assessments from children. This could be an online system with elf’s perhaps providing feedback. Currently children have little opportunity to speak to the naughty or nice question with relevant supporting data.

Stetz concluded Santa would do well to employ an I-O psychologist. I concur.
 
My take-away:
 
Can any of the recommendations for Santa’s performance system be applied to your organization? If so, 2023 might be a good year to work toward improvements. Feedback is key to employee development and organizational growth and renewal.
 
Best wishes for the holiday season and a great 2025.
 
Stetz, T. A. (2012). What Santa Claus can learn from I-O psychology: Eight performance management recommendations. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49 (3), 35-37.
 
Image of Santa by Pixaline. Image obtained from 
https://pixabay.com/vectors/christmas-santa-claus-winter-gifts-2840575/​
​
Modified from my previous blogs about Santa. © John Ballard, PhD, 2024. All rights reserved.
 _________________________
Decoding the Workplace “deals with principles and practices that are timeless . . . Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018. Now also available as an audiobook and other formats. ​​
0 Comments

On Being Thankful

11/30/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture

Thanksgiving is my favorite holiday. Less commercialism, advertising. I take some time to be on my own to focus on those aspects of my life, the people in my life, the wealth of adventures and experiences, and feel thankful, really thankful.

This year in March I replaced the plastic mat in my study. I tried to break the old one to put it in a trash bin. I folded the old mat, started to stand on it, and immediately recognized my mistake. I was like a lumberjack on a rolling log. Down I went onto a concrete patio. Fortunately my muscle memory retains doing parachute landing falls in my younger years. My body turned as I fell. I landed hard but my organs and head were fine. MRIs showed my right arm and shoulder had seven torn tendons. My rotator cuff had two that were not repairable. How am I? My body is learning to live with some new physical limitations but my spirit remains joyous and loving. I am thankful for so very much. 


Thankfulness deserves an ingrained place in our cultures, including our workplaces. Ed Locke in a classic review of job satisfaction decades ago found that one of most important sources of job satisfaction was simply feedback, especially positive feedback. In the course of our days and weeks, there will be times when we will be glad for the work of others, the contributions of others. In short, we will be thankful for our colleague or colleagues. As managers we may be thankful for the work of our direct reports. Let them know. Let them know you appreciate their work, their contribution. It is great to be thankful of another. It is even better to let them know.
_____________________________________________________________
​
 © John Ballard, PhD,  2024. All rights reserved. Partially modified from my blog of 11/23/2012.

Image by ijmaki. Obtained from 
https://pixabay.com/illustrations/social-social-network-1206610/
_____________________
Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018. Available as ebook, hardback, paperback, audiobook, and audio CD. The best-selling audiobook, and CD, are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

Managers, Are You Increasing Stress on Others? Six Questions

10/30/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Stress is a normal part of most workplaces. A little stress can be good but stress can easily become dysfunctional and cost time, money, and energy. Estimates for the annual cost of dysfunctional stress in U.S. organizations range as high as $300 billion. Managers play a big role in determining the amount of stress is in the workplace. If you are a manager,  how well do you help reduce stress in the workplace? Or do you unnecessarily increase stress in the workplace? Here are six questions for managers to reflect on.  

1.  Do I inadvertently support stress-inducing norms? Every workplace has formal and informal rules. Some informal rules or norms become well established even though they may be dysfunctional. 
  • Do employees work long hours beyond what is really necessary? 
  • How long is the workday really? 
  • Is time off for vacations encouraged or seen as behavior of those less loyal?

2. Do I consider the potential negative impact of my behaviors on others? Some managers behave inconsistently such that employees are not sure what to expect. A manager gives instructions on Monday, changes them on Wednesday, and changes them again on Friday. Others assign work to be done at the last minute and expect immediate results.

3. What information do I provide to my employees? Often managers tell employees what employees need to know but not necessarily what employees want to know. They may not need to know the context of a decision but where that context can be provided, it may be helpful. It is also good to avoid surprises. As soon as possible, stop rumors, especially those that may have a negative impact.

4. Am I really a good listener or do I just think that I am? I am continually surprised by the number of managers who think they are great listeners but aren’t. 
  • Can you actively listen? 
  • What is going on in your mind when someone is talking with you? 
  • Are you thinking about answers to questions or formulating questions, or are you truly listening to the words, emotions, and body language of the other. 
  • Worse yet, are you multi-tasking, for example, working on your computer? 
One key to helping employees manage workplace stress is recognizing it. Actively listening helps.

5. Do I support my employees? Easy to answer “sure” but do you?
  • How easy is it for employees to come to you with requests or questions?
  • How often do you ask, “Is there anything where you need my help?”
  • Do you know your direct reports well enough to know what rewards they value the most?
  • Can you identify recent actions on your part that demonstrate you support your people?

6. Am I a good role model? The leader sets the example. 
  • Do you stay in the office until your boss is gone? 
  • Do you manage your stress? Do you take time to exercise? 
  • Do you meditate, do yoga, or engage in other activities that reduce your stress?Do you encourage use of any company policies that encourage wellness?

Stress impacts the bottom-line through health care costs and lost productivity. If you are a manager, assess your impact on stress in the workplace and adjust as best you can. For those not in managerial positions, think about your supervisors. How would you size them up on these questions? 

Modified from my original article published online, September 2, 2015, in the American Management Association's Playbook and modified from my blog 3/11/2019. © John Ballard, PhD,  2024. All rights reserved.

Image, "stress-management", by Mohamed Hassan. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/illustrations/angry-businesswoman-conflict-3233158/

_____________________
Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018. Available as ebook, hardback, paperback, audiobook, and audio CD. The best-selling audiobook, and CD, are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments

Age and Perceptions of Leadership

9/30/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Does the age of a leader affect our perceptions of that leader’s effectiveness? Are there differences in how we view older leaders versus younger leaders?  Age and leadership is a subject not often surfaced except occasionally around U.S. presidential elections. To consider age in personnel actions is usually discriminatory. But how do we, admittedly or not, think about leaders and age?

Spisak, Grabo, Arvey, and van Vugt addressed this question in The Leadership Quarterly in 2014. They discussed two functions of leadership that may be seen as age-related:
exploration and exploitation. 
  • Exploration strategies encourage “risk-taking and innovation to remain adaptive and competitive in changing environments” (p. 806). 
  • Exploitation strategies “create stability and minimize negative costs associated with uncertainty by refinement and execution of preexisting systems” (p. 806). 
The authors argued that groups need both. Exploration requires searching the dynamics of the environment whereas exploitation is about stability and finding best practices.

In three interesting experiments, the researchers examined preferences for leadership in different business-related situations. The participants were undergraduates at VU University Amsterdam. Participants were given scenarios and shown faces of older and younger people. In two of the experiments researchers used software to morph young faces to older faces.  Spisak et al. designed each experiment to assess preferences for change leadership versus stability as associated with older and younger faces.  

Across all three experiments the results supported their hypothesis: 
  • “Younger leadership is preferred when followers are looking for a leader in times of exploratory change” (p. 812).
  •   “When followers are focused on the need for stable exploitation. they look to older leaders.” (p. 812).

My take-aways:

1.  Spisak et al. used an evolutionary perspective to suggest human groups have developed these preferences from our experiences over history – a preference for youth when new opportunities and exploration are needed, a preference for older leadership when things are going well and incremental change is fine. The authors argued these are not stereotypes.

2.  Regardless of theoretical orientation, their results point to possible biases in how we think about leaders, both on the large stage and in organizations. Do we really prefer younger leaders where change is imperative? Are we inclined toward older workers where things are going well and change is not imperative? Spisak et al.’s participants (university undergraduates) may limit how much we can conclude from their report. Even so they raise interesting questions about how we may view  age and leadership in different situations. 



Spisak, B. R., Grabo, A. E., Arvey, R. D., & van Vugt, M. (2014). The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 805-816.

Image of "businessman" by PaliGraficas. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/vectors/elegant-businessman-manager-3176410/

Image of "strong man" by TheAZShow. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/illustrations/man-strong-man-masculine-serious-8308094/
​

Modified from my blog 10/21/2014. © John Ballard, PhD,  2024. All rights reserved.
_
0 Comments

My Third Total Solar Eclipse

8/31/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
A life-long amateur astronomer, I imagined I would become an eclipse chaser, researching and traveling to parts of the world where I could stand in the shadow of the moon during total solar eclipses. But life brought different priorities. In July of 1991 I backpacked up Mauna Loa on The Big Island of Hawaii with my friend Richard Bilodeau. On July 11 I experienced my first total solar eclipse in a volcanic wilderness. Richard and I wrote a Kindle e-story based on Richard’s experience. The beginning of that story is told here. I described my experience of that eclipse in this blog many years later. I experienced my second total solar eclipse on August 21, 2017, the first of two Great American eclipses. My wife and I ventured to western Nebraska. The story of that eclipse is told here. 
 
For seven years it was with great anticipation I awaited April 8, 2024. Once again a Great American Eclipse would sweep the nation, this time southwest to northeast. Significantly for my wife and me this time fate offered a special gift. On the afternoon of April 8 the shadow of the moon would pass over our house in Beavercreek, Ohio. We could observe the eclipse from our yard. 2 minutes of totality. However the shadow would also pass over Greenfield, Indiana, where dear friends had invited us to observe with them. Almost 4 minutes of totality. View from our home or view with special friends? We chose Indiana. From our friends’ backyard we watched as the sky grew darker, night lights came on, birds ceased to chirp and sing. Suddenly the diamond ring appeared and there was the silver corona. Two solar prominences glowed red. Venus shone below and west of the Moon/Sun. Jupiter above and to the east. For almost four minutes we shared this wondrous celestial event. For our friends it was their first total solar eclipse experience, an experience mystical and moving. For the third time in this lifetime, as I stood in the shadow of the moon, tears formed in my eyes. 
 
Nothing compares with a total solar eclipse. Even if the sun is 99.9% covered by the moon, there is no comparison. As I once read, a partial eclipse is like riding in an airplane. A total solar eclipse is like jumping out of an airplane. Having jumped from planes in my youth, I can wholeheartedly agree with that statement. Experiencing a total solar eclipse is unique. In the year leading up to the eclipse I encouraged friends and acquaintances not to miss it, explaining how to view before, during, and after totality. In the weeks after the April 8 eclipse many people told me how it was so much more amazing than what they had expected. In this modern era it can seem somethings are overly hyped. For most people you cannot overhype a total solar eclipse. 
 
On August 2, 2027, a total solar eclipse will cross north Africa. At maximum totality the moon will cover the sun for over six minutes, the longest totality in the lifetime of those alive today. The next Great American Eclipse is August 12, 2045, a path from northern Californian to Florida. My guess is for that one I will have exited this body and be on to new adventures. 2045. If you are around, try to stand in the shadow of the moon.


Eclipse image (2017) by bdabney. Obtained from https://pixabay.com/photos/eclipse-great-american-eclipse-2017-2794194/

​
© John Ballard, PhD, 2024. All rights reserved.
 _________________________
Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018. Available as ebook, hardback, paperback, audiobook, and audio CD. The best-selling audiobook, and CD, are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.
 
0 Comments

Research:  5 Characteristics Associated with Happy People

7/31/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Are you happy? What kind of person tends to be happy? In their classic study in a 1995 issue of  Psychological Science, David Myers and Ed Diener reported studies have consistently identified five characteristics associated with happy people. Do you have a propensity toward happiness? Ask yourself these questions based on Myers and Diener.

-- Do you like yourself? Happy people tend to agree with statements such as “I am fun to be with.” They believe they are easy to get along with and feel good about themselves.  They have high self-esteem. Happy people like themselves. 

-- Do you feel you have some personal control in your life? Studies show that people deprived of control have lower morale. Consider people trapped in poverty, people in repressive regimes, people held prisoner, people in poor health. 

-- Are you an optimist or a pessimist? People who come at life expecting good outcomes and success tend to be happier than people who are pessimistic. Research supports numerous benefits derived from an optimistic approach to life. 

-- Are you more introverted or extraverted? Extraverts tend toward more happiness than introverts. The authors speculated that it may be due to extraverts having more social contacts and relationships. In general the positive benefits of relationships outweigh any negatives.

-- Are you religious or spiritual? People who are religious or spiritual tend to be happier. One Gallup poll found “the highly spiritual were twice as likely to say they were ‘very happy’.”  

Happy people: good self-esteem, a sense of personal control, optimistic, extraverted, religious or spiritual. 

Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6 (1), 10-19.

Image of Mount Edgecumbe. © John Ballard, 2013. All rights reserved.

Modified from my blog 8/28/2013. © John Ballard, PhD, 2024. All rights reserved.
​ _________________________

Decoding the Workplace “Is this a must-have for managers and would-be managers? Yes.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, June, 2018. Available as ebook, hardback, paperback, audiobook, and audio CD. The best-selling audiobook, and CD, are narrated by Timothy Andrés Pabon.

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    RSS Feed