Leadership, Management & Life in the Workplace
  • Blog
  • About John
  • Decoding the Workplace
  • Dr. Juran AIG Archival Project
  • Contact
  • Disclaimers

On Generational Differences

3/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
Much has been written about differences among generations, especially birth cohorts. Although birth years for cohorts vary slightly across studies, they tend to be similar to this:
  • Baby Boomers  (born 1946-1964)
  • Gen-Xers (1965-1979)
  • Millennials (1980-2000)
Amy Drew summarized work on birth cohorts in the Association for Psychological Science publication, Observer, in January 2015.  The premise of birth cohort research is that sociocultural influences are different across time and affect generations differently.  Vivid events are part of a shared cultural lens: for Boomers, the assassinations of John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and Martin Luther King, Jr.; for Millennials, 9/11. Similarly consider the impact of technology: Boomers grew up without computers, social media, video games, the Internet, a very different world than Millennials.  Millennials know a very global world.

Teasing out potential affects associated with cohorts is difficult. Jean Twenge of San Diego State University found Millennials more narcissistic. Kali Trzesniewski, now at UC, Davis, found no overall increase in narcissism. Likewise studies on whether Millennials have a greater sense that “outside forces beyond their control” significantly affect them (higher external locus of control) have mixed results.

So are there any consistent findings that have emerged from research across generations? There are:
  • “Since the late 1970s” there have been significant decreases in Empathic Concern, that is having “sympathy for others’ misfortunes.” 
  • Likewise, Perspective Taking has decreased, that is,  “the tendency to see a situation from another person’s point of view” (p. 20).
  • Younger generations are less attached, with higher proportions agreeing “I am comfortable without close emotional relationships.”
  • Younger generations have increased levels of anxiety and depression and this has been reported also in other countries. 
  • “We all tend to get happier as we age” but the economic environment into which we are born and grow up affects our well-being baselines, that is people who experience young adulthood during tough economies have a lower baseline that those who experience young adulthood during more prosperous economies. 
  • People who enter young adulthood during recessions tend to be less narcissistic. 

My take-aways:

1.  I use to be skeptical that there were significant birth cohort or generational differences.  I am not as skeptical as I use to be. I hear many stories from the corporate world about generational issues. I experience differences in the classroom. The times they are a ‘changing.

2.  Generational research is very difficult to do. I think a measure of caution is appropriate in drawing firm conclusions. For example, in the list above, new research could bring these findings into question.

3.  With that said, generational differences is an area with which every leader needs to be familiar. In some situations there may be important differences between how one leads Boomers versus how one leads Millennials.

4.  Ultimately though, the leader must guard against stereotyping based on age. While there may be commonalities across generations, each person is unique with different interests and motivations. Be aware of possible generational affects but don’t stereotype an individual because they are part of a particular generation.

Drew, A. (2015). Talkin’ about your generation. Observer, 28 (1), 19-21.

Image by Дарко Максимовић. Used with permission Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Obtained from: http://commons.wikimedia.org
____________________________________
Follow me on Facebook at  https://www.facebook.com/johnballardphd
On Twitter: @johnballardphd
Decoding the Workplace: 50 Keys to Understanding People in Organizations, coming in May, 
http://www.abc-clio.com/Praeger/product.aspx?pc=A4781C
Available for pre-order at leading on-line bookstores such as Amazon.com


0 Comments

On Leaders and Escalating Commitment

3/5/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
When do you abandon a project? When do you stay the course? Helga Drummond addressed these questions in an excellent, easy-to-read article in the November 2014 issue of The Academy of Management Perspectives. Drummond is scholar of managerial decision making at the University of Liverpool.  In this contribution she examined the forces to persist and the forces to abandon projects based her review of the literature. Many of these studies have been about “escalating commitment,” basically spending good money on a poor project beyond the point at which it should have been abandoned.

Drummond suggested that managers are taught to avoid escalating commitment but they need more guidance on when to persist and not give up.  My brief review of the literature supports this. Among the forces to persist are overconfidence, sunk costs, and exit barriers; forces to abandon, opportunity costs, reluctance to renew budgets, and organizational factors. Drummond’s analysis is  thorough and of significance to decision makers. 

When are people likely to abandon a project when they probably should not?
  • When there is a crisis. Managers overreact, overcome by a “vivid event” or events that grab attention -- although statistically the odds favor continuing. 
  • Where there is high risk and an absence of leadership. For example, projects where project managers come and go during the life of the project. 
  • Where there are conflicting factors that offset each other such that managers reinvest enough to keep the project alive but not enough to make the project a success.

My take-aways:

1.  Drummond’s article should be required reading for all leaders, managers, and project managers. She gives many “real world” examples such as BP oil drillers who went 3 meters beyond after being told to quit and hit “one of the world’s largest oil fields.” 

2.  The article underscores the importance of good leadership. Leaders with high responsibility in situations of high-perceived risks make the best economic decisions. Give the tough projects to the best leaders. Give them all the information available. Let them do their jobs. Let them make the decisions. And give them a copy of Drummond’s excellent article.

Drummond, H. (2014). Escalation of commitment: When to stay the course? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 4, 430-446.

Image of Victoria Building, University of Liverpool, by Derek Harper. Obtained from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Victoria_Building,_University_of_Liverpool_-_geograph.org.uk_-_209212.jpg.  Use with permission http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
____________________________________
Follow me on Facebook at  https://www.facebook.com/johnballardphd
On Twitter: @johnballardphd
Decoding the Workplace: 50 Keys to Understanding People in Organizations.
http://www.abc-clio.com/Praeger/product.aspx?pc=A4781C


0 Comments

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    RSS Feed