Leadership, Management & Life in the Workplace
  • Blog
  • About John
  • Decoding the Workplace
  • Dr. Juran AIG Archival Project
  • Contact
  • Disclaimers

Leader Development: The Importance of Relationships

5/7/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Does leader development move through stages? Komives’s Leader Identity Development (LID) model answers yes and describes the stages.

Shepherd and Horner (2010) used the LID model in their discussion of leadership at institutions of the United States government where formal, intensive leader development is at the heart of the mission: the Naval Academy in Annapolis, the Military Academy at West Point, the Air Force Academy in Colorado, and the Coast Guard Academy in Connecticut. They studied leadership at “a highly selective, East Coast military college” following students from their first year through their senior year.

Shepherd and Horner described leader development at the service academies as being hierarchical and consistent with the LID model. During the first year the emphasis is on self-leadership, learning to follow orders, learning teamwork, and understanding the culture. In the second year students supervise the new first year students and help them learn professional knowledge. After two years, most students will have reached the LID stage of Generality where they are developing an understanding of the greater good and a better understanding of the potential of leadership to effect change. During these last two years students assume even greater responsibilities leading other students through actions and as role models. Their focus moves from the individual level to the organizational level. Leadership is internalized and each student develops a model of his or her own leadership identity. This hierarchical system is common to all service academies.

Shepherd and Horner’s study asked what is the best predictor of leadership ability, which they defined as aptitude for commissioning as a military officer. This aptitude is measured each semester. What has the greatest impact on this measure of leader ability? Was it GPA? Athletic participation? Years at the academy? Or peer rankings?

Their finding: “Consistent with industrial-era leadership studies, there is sufficient evidence to support the argument that ranking by one’s peers continues to be a significant indicator of an individual’s leadership development” (p. 26). There was no close second.

My take-aways:

(1) Leadership is about relationships. The service academies are unique. Students rating each other live with each other in a relatively closed environment nearly 24/7.  Even here though, there will be different levels of relationships. Different types of situational leaders may be masked. But overall, who best to assess leadership potential than those who work and live with each other?  How do you see the leader potential of those around you? How do they see your leader potential? Regardless of whether or not you are actually in a leadership position, are you perceived as a leader?

(2) Shepherd and Horner’s study underscores the importance of peer feedback. Add in feedback from direct reports and supervisors and a good case can be made for 360 degree feedback. But a caveat, if trust is not part of the culture, 360 degree feedback may be problematic. Do you have those you trust who can give you honest feedback? Do you ask for that feedback? If so, do you use that feedback to grow as a leader?

(3) A self inventory of our relationships and how others see us may be a good exercise. Where are our relationships strong? Where do we need to reach out and build new or better relationships?

(4) The service academies have a structure that allows educators to construct intense leadership experiences and opportunities for young men and women. Do all become leaders? Probably not. But I would venture the academies as leadership laboratories produce their fair share for our nation’s future.

Sheperd, R. S., & Horner, D. H., Jr. (2010). Indicators of leadership development in undergraduate military education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4 (2), 18-29.

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Julia A. Casper/Released. https://www.flickr.com/photos/usnavy/9194221810/in/photostream/
Used with permission: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en      

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    RSS Feed